Eee oop, report comin' out-copyright Hipgnosis AHM |
The Sydney Herald used the heading "Findings small tip of an iceberg" to breathlessly tell us how bad it was going to be. You missed out "the small tip of an ENORMOUS iceberg" Tony! Then wrote a thundering editorial about the relationship between unions in Australia and the Labor party. Then Tony Turnbull said it was a watershed moment for the labour movement and certainly, in no uncertain terms, not just a case of a few rotten apples. It was evidence based in fact. Fact! Fact! Fact!
Well in my view I would add a rider: Stand back people there is not as much substance here as the headline or Mr Turnbull's response might cause you to think. The Commission ran for two years, held 189 days of hearings, involving 505 witnesses. Mr Heydon was paid an obscene amount of money (about approximately 1 million dollars per year), the unions said 18 million dollars was spent in keeping the Commission in gravy. ABC radio reckons a cool 46 million plus! Enough money pissed down a legal drain to have funded a number of indigenous support services, or other worthy causes. But no, the Unions needed a jolly good investigation and shake up and the honourable J D was the bloke to do it. The brief reads as if lets shake the tree and see what falls out and interview as many malcontents as we can and see what we can make stick in doing so. Well my words, it were far more legal posh than that. So was it brass well spent? I will declare my bias. I am a member of a trade union, me dad was a communist and trade unionist and most of me ma's family were in the UK seamans union. So let's review...
MUA - Go Away! Says Heydon the just |
Now in the opening paragraph the man quotes Sir Harry Gibbs-(no not the father of the BeeGees as far as I am aware; though the report would have been a lot sexier with a title like "Staying Alive"). However Lord Heydon wanted to test Sir Gibbs's maxim that "the inherent decency of the Australian people continue". By George! Where did I park my gun boat? Me top hat, fly swat and feathers Jeeves, please! And no he was not referring to the introduction of holiday pay, sick leave or any number of improved work conditions fought for and gained by unions over the years. I think he was referring to our ability to not blink at the expenditure of such a large wad of our tax take without blinking, thinking it well spent to state the obvious...in all walks of life, there are the corrupt, the greedy and the self-serving. The Unions are not exempt and have never claimed to be.
So on to the headline or the stuff up in big letters contained in the over long summary report:
Unions are riddled with "widespread" and "deep seated" misconduct. No carry on, enjoy the full breadth of the man's thinking "...probably (legal word meaning banged up to rights) only the most egregious (bollock scratching) examples of misconduct...These aberrations cannot be regarded as isolated (obviously plague like-unionists dripping pus littering the political landscape). They are not the work of a few rogue unions, or a few rogue officials (although this is the guts; the sins of the few-magnified lovingly in prose like a fleas balls in a gale, of what is recorded in the report. Boot a bit of tar and feathering is always good for the soul)...it is widespread (except the Northern Territories, yeah I know go figure!) It is deep seated...It would be utterly (isn't that subjective your honour?) naive to think what has been uncovered is anything other than a small tip of an enormous iceberg." (And the evidence to support this contention? A Tonyism-a small number of serving union officials are bent, crooked and should be hung out to be pelted with rotten cabbages-but this does not provide substance to this statement.)
"...But it is clear that in many parts of the world constituted by Australian trade union officials, there is room for louts, thugs, bullies, thieves, perjurers, those who threaten violence, errant fiduciaries (those who hold/oversee the money bags), and organisers of boycotts." (Did we go to Moscow for the Olympics one year?Louts, thugs, perjurers and bullies can describe a number of settings. And gosh, are their not times when this could describe Parliaments?Senate? Upper Houses. A lot of work places, professional bodies-throw in thieves-those caught rooking their clients, possibly even lawyers are not unknown to such descriptors, from time to time-but not judges except in Queensland...). Sorry, its an age thing, I tend to be easily distracted when reading legal telephone directories as summary. But Carry On Justice Heydon: the report goes on to state "A sinister picture appears to form. It is a picture the unions concerned not with its role as the instrument through which to protect the interests of its members but with self interest. Its primary interest is in the leading group of its officials as a self perpetuating institution. The institution comes to operate like a Venetian oligarchy or a Whig Parliament with very few electoral contests. It is an institution more concerned with gathering members than servicing them." Breathtaking. Sounds like the average mens club in operation. Lets just reflect (pictures below) on some of the unions representing aspects of our work environment who have been condemned in this statement. Yes, all corrupt undoubtably self serving with nowt to offer the modern industrial/working world.
Supermarket workers |
Nurses |
Energy sector |
Asian Women |
But what is lost and damaged in this report is the good work done by unions. The fundamental decency of the majority of office holders who give of their time to improve workplace conditions and protect ongoing safety standards. And given the current attacks on our employment conditions this representation is necessary. This report does not address why at this time when we are reaching austerity by stealth conditions, this is a necessity. Or why for the health of our society we should support the work of unions to ensure employers do not turn back the clock to treat employees as commodities to suck dry and discard. For example the same Sydney Herald today had a piece about American businesses who do not give their workers sick leave and people out of economic necessity turning up at work sick, and when infectious infecting others. Read it at:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace-relations/is-going-to-work-sick-really-a-good-idea-20151229-glwkim.html
Do we want that kind of employment conditions to take root here in Australia? And isn't this, the threat of casualisation, taking away penalty rates and zero hour contracts good reasons to sustain and maintain a healthy union framework across our employment sector.
The report summary also does not address with any compassion (just mealy mouthed attacks on unions) the wreckage caused by deceit and fraud that is the case in for example the Health Services Union (HSU). Members of this union are some of the most disadvantaged in the workforce. I doubt nailing Ms Jackson's scrotum to the mast of the good ship Dyson has given them solace. Using there trauma as a legal/political football shows a gross lack of fundamental decency and no doubt in the days to come they will be kicked equally as part of a union bashing exercise.
Already this morning (31 December 2015) Senator Cash (Employment and wizard at breezily dismissing the ginormous wads of dollars spent as top drawer bangs for bucks) and Malkie Turnbull are claiming the report supports evidence of systematic corruption. Cash careful to say in some unions but this needs a big hammer of reform to smash. Yes, there is evidence that in some unions there was systemic issues which allowed corruption to occur and these unions have already addressed this. Then there were the threats to take this to election and Cash asked everyone to read this report. Well we should, we payed mighty for it and as you read whisper forty million bucks to yourself. Good luck I say, it is not an accessible read, large wads of legalise, turgid and one sided and at the end of it, like reality TV, you may have indignation with what you read but may also be left with a sense of being manipulated to see things in a certain way. IT DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE SYSTEMIC ISSUES ACROSS THE WHOLE UNION MOVEMENT, but does position itself to suggest this is the case. A con. More smoke and mirrors to make something appear bigger and more of a current issue infecting all unions than it is.
Whether Mr Turnbull says it many Tony times as he likes, it is a case of a few rotten apples to the many decent, hard working, committed members and officials. This over expensive commission was set up by the Abbott government to reduce the influence of unions, take down a few politicians in the process but most importantly introduce work choices by stealth. As for the report writer, he didn't even have the decency to step down when it was shown he had a conflict of interest-of which is happy to cast aspersions on unions having re union superannuation funds etc. He did not treat people decently when it was evident findings were insufficient to hang them out to dry-but nonetheless, he left them to hang out to dry (Gillard and Shorten come to mind-releasing findings exonerating Shorten late on a Friday night but still hinting as an office holder Shorten was tainted by guilt). And that is the gist of this report all of us in unions are tainted by the guilt of the few. Gosh but Parliamentarians, political parties are not all tainted by Slipper, Bishop (the older) or the conveyor belt of NSW pollies who did not know the difference between conflict of interest, tainted cash and their political responsibilities to their electorate. And who consistently used the Murdoch defence of "I don't recall". Talk about hostile, unhelpful witnesses. "Oh is this a smoking gun? I don't recall how it got into my hand (bank account). Am I holding it. It must have been planted via the family trust". etc.
Yes punish those who have misused their position and that should be so in all walks of life. Yes, good unions like anyone else should have checks and balances sufficient to prevent fraud and should not condone bullying or the use of intimidation. And the majority do and some named in this report have taken action to address the matters raised. Some, such as HSU have had to deal with the legal process and the legal rights of those accused of wrong doing to appeal (such as Thompson and Jackson).
But has this Commission demonstrated whether "the inherent decency of the Australian people continue" this has been besmirched by the findings? Not even close. The 50 rat bags identified in eighteen months of proceedings are named and shamed and some rightly. 45 individuals will be referred to criminal prosecution or civil action. But ask yourself this, based on the material in this report, how many of those will the police actually, following investigation, send to court? HSU has already succeeded in civil action against Jackson et al. And of those of the magnitude of Jackson et al, who may well face further criminal court time, rather than civil action; how many of those will be found guilty? The evidence, as in this report is not as solid as it is pitched to meet a finding of beyond reasonable doubt. I hope with the likes of Jackson it does based on what is already in the public domain. However, a good lawyer and plenty of gravy will make it as slow as paint drying and not necessarily result in justice for those most wronged-members of the unions where corruption has been shown to have occurred.
To rub salt into injury beware of Liberals getting up on their feet making platitude statements about wanting to protect the rights of hard working union members. Be ashamed Senator Cash, given the public service hard working staff are currently being thrashed by toxic enterprise agreements and are with the support of their union CPSU continuing to vote no to unfair changes to conditions. Supporting hard working union members? I think not and nor will this current Nat/Lib rabble ever be genuinely supportive of union rights but they will continue to use every opportunity to undermine those rights.
And the recommendations ?
- Tougher penalties for misconduct by officials, stricter rules about financial disclosure by unions and new cicil penalties for unions who don't keep proper records. Question: Shouldn't these measures already be place and cover the private sector, all political parties and charities-why single out unions when the newspapers are consistently showing corruption, poor record keeping occurs across society.
- To create a union watchdog.
- To establish Australian Building and Construction Commission to oversee workplace relations in the building industry. Question: Did it work previously-no. Did it improve work place conditions/safety-No.
The report can be purchased for sixpence from any corner shop and can be used indefinitely to line the bottom of the hamster's cage.
See this article from Guardian Australia where the writer makes the point the recommendations that Turnbull is threatening wholesale introduction of, sets a higher set of standards than that of the private sector. Smells like union bashing...
hhttp://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/30/the-hits-the-misses-and-the-zealous-overreach-of-the-trade-union-royal-commission
Another article on the changing face of Australian unions:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/06/the-female-bosses-destroying-the-image-of-union-thugs-forever
And from New Matilda:
https://newmatilda.com/2016/01/12/reflections-on-the-turc-from-a-union-official/
Further Postscript 23 March 2016: Showing five charges referred to federal police have already been dropped. What a bloody waste of time this enquiry has been despite the NatLibs still pushing for a building commissar:
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/23/fifth-set-of-criminal-charges-from-union-royal-commission-taskforce-dropped